Was the Baron Davis signing a failure?

The dismal start to the season for Los Angeles Clippers puts into question the signing they did in summer by Baron Davis. Who has further damaged the transfer? What the Warriors, who lost their franchise man? Or the Clippers, who can not find your site?

It is assumed that Baron Davis was going to be part of a project to bring success to the Los Angeles Clippers, given that they intended to stay (re-sign) to Elton Brand. However, the forward and his agent negotiated for free and ended in Phialdelphia Sixers player (team still has not shown much potential). Moreover, the style of Baron Davis does not gel in the system established by the Clippers coach, Mike Dunleavy, Sr.

It seems clear that both the one and another have taken a step backwards. Both the Clippers, and Baron Davis, which is a shame for a player already in the last year showed signs of fatigue. In addition, the superstar contract signed with the Clippers is for many years, which leaves little room for maneuver. In addition, Baron Davis's dream of playing in his hometown was not just playing with the Clippers.

But the Warriors also have been damaged by this signing, if not directly by problems of Baron Davis. The output of the player caused problems within the computer policy, and would theoretically serve to lead to more pressure and Monta Ellis, player of great projection. Sure, you see I was young and foolish and injury cost him a fine. Furthermore, we assume that the money achieved by not having Davis on the team were going to get a super-star like Elton Brand or Gilbert Arenas, but ultimately stayed with Corey Maggette is not the style of coach Don Nelson.