The case revives the controversy Navia the gentleman's agreement

The gentlemen's agreement, this contract ghostly between clubs from Mexico, continues to claim victims. In this case, the consideration is the Chilean striker Reynaldo Navia, who thwarted his return to football because of the Amafi Aztec owners. It turns out that Navia was intended by the Veracruz team currently with the League of Ascent. Without wasting, America demanded a payment of $ 300,000 to jarochos over the signing. The Port club declined to pay, and Navia could not enlist with the sharks. Another who also happened hardship for the covenant is Walter Gaitan. The midfielder also claimed by the Veracruz, but Necaxa must give its approval for signing is effected.

There are many cases that dot Mexican football. The most notorious example, perhaps, is that of Antonio de Nigris, who could not be repatriated to Mexico because the team that would like to hire should drop a lanite to Monterrey. How about Juan Francisco Palencia, who in his time also marred by the transfer agreement between Pumas and Chivas, or Aaron Galindo, to be repatriated by Chivas had to pass a share to his former team, Cruz Azul. It is even rumored that the pass from Miguel Layún to America is part of a secret agreement whereby Cuauhtemoc Blanco came to the Red Sharks, as the former Atalanta left the club Veracruz.

Meanwhile, FIFA does not know, do not see (or want to see), not listening, not acting. The Mexican players are treated like vile goods, without the slightest respect for their profession. In a football culture drenched bite and mocha, the players' careers are threatened by dark the ins and outs of managers. How long? Unfortunately, FIFA said that until a member of the FMF raise your hand, put hand in the matter. And that will not happen while the market remains legs round business.