Motorsport

While in Europe and is a constant use of diesel engines, low capacity where possible, users Americans are divided over the use of large displacement engines or new low consumption engines, along with the also new urban models that deliver great fuel economy. The increasingly high prices of gasoline, suggest whether it is worthwhile to continue a V8 engine, which offers the same versatility as an engine of 1 liter.

Let's establish some differences in use. While those who read us from South America prefer diesel engines or failing small displacement, those living in Mexico are divided between those who prefer the use of 6 and 8 cylinder engines. In Argentina we find a very high percentage of vehicles powered by CNG (compressed natural gas) has extended its use for many years, being the pioneer in use on this side of the world.

In markets like that of Venezuela , where the cost of gas is not a major problem still teem with large V8 engines. The torque and power of these engines, certainly are a significant factor for users Venezuelans say no because the factor of the ridiculous prices paid in the service station also influences the decision. Speaking of Mexico, the other major market in the area, the arrival of more economical vehicles hits those who still think it's worth the sacrifice to maintain high displacement engines, an influence that is accentuated by the proximity of the U.S. and its V6 and V8 models.

The reality is that the difference in consumption is nearly three times in favor of a four-cylinder model, if the vehicle is used in a normal context of use, ie just move from one point to another. For this, a 1.2 engine or 1.4-liter gives the same service as a V8, saving a significant amount of money per week or per month. In parallel, the new hybrids are slowly growing in countries like Mexico, although "extrañanamente" the diesels have never had a definitive start.

If you ask me, and I have my opinion formed. The V8 are powerful and great engine sound that swells up to the coldest, the V6 can get to compete with them, especially the most recent. But at the moment of truth, when making accounts and reviewing the budget for fuel, small motors win on all fronts, as in most of the world.

Admission powered car? big or small displacement engine? appears first in MotorFull .

When presented the Twizy RS F1 we were totally surprised by the freedom it gave the Gauls engineers to create the most radical Twizy possible. The result has been the incorporation of a KERS extracted from a Formula 1, items such as tires, pulled out of Formula Renault 2.5, the integrated rear spoiler light rain ... elements seen only in the competition to dress the Twizy RS F1 gala.

Let's talk numbers. The RS F1 Twizy weighs 545 pounds and is rated at 97 hp while the Megane RS has a weight on the scale of 1462 kilos for an output of 265 horses. That is, the Megane weighs three times the Twizy RS F1 but has no power triple.

We all wondered at the time if the Megane RS would have something to do on a drag race against RS F1 Twizy Renault and people stood the same question, so wanted to make this video in which face the most radical Twizy against the most powerful member of the RS. Hit play:

As you saw, the Twizy RS F1 is well accompanied by two Megane RS and starting off the Megane seems to be doing something, but it enabled the two cams that give the order to Twizy RS KERS in F1 and miss all the pilots hope for the Megane. The momentum is huge and has to be awesome acceleration feeling in this little Twizy.

Both accelerate from 0-100 km / h in 6 seconds and the only question in the video is up to speed come. I think not reach 100 km / h and remain at about 60-70 km / h, where the KERS boost turbo dominates the Megane but it seems that, at least, he should at least reach it.

The future is clear, conventional cars will have a KERS in a few years, the result is sensational.

The entrance Twizy RS Vs Megane F1 RS, gentlemen place your bets listed first in MotorFull .

While still mulling over the idea of P1 McLaren successor , the motoring world keeps turning and in this case, the innovation focuses on the Gemballa McLaren 12C Spider, which now has a new unique and quite striking uniform but in my neither case seems excessive. I have come to see things far worse.

Like every year Gemballa is a brand that always surprises us towards projects like Tornado Porsche and even the new Mistrale. But today we offer the new Gemballa McLaren 12C Spider that follows the same lines developed from doing years by the German coach. A model based on the McLaren McLaren MP4-12C Spider that was introduced almost a year ago, but in this case has received some striking developments in contrasting colors such as are orange and white. But as stated above, this Gemballa McLaren 12C Spider seems rather taken by the department McLaren customization, if not for some elements a bit strident. But of course, otherwise there would be a Gemballa, right?.

Does the positive side of the Gemballa McLaren 12C Spider?. That what we have available from € 19,980 (excluding taxes) for aerodynamic exterior kit includes items such as a new rear spoiler, new front bumper, new side skirts and a striking rear diffuser. However, if we want to provide an even greater personality, add another € 7980 (also without tax) for slow 20 and 21 inches will carry this unique custom model. Obviously as it happens that almost all customizations, inside interior leather will consist of consumer tastes and also elements and instruments handmade by Gemballa. Yes, the inner pack has no official price yet, but perhaps we can get an idea of what it might cost if we look at the image gallery. Enjoy it.

The entrance Gemballa McLaren 12C Spider has a new uniform is listed first in MotorFull .

I am among those who think that betting on the R & D always brings long-term benefits directly or indirectly. That is why I have always thought that sustainable development is not an option today, but rather an obligation to our future generations. This example of commitment we have recently seen in cities like Oslo and with the development of electric model. In this case we will talk about another very interesting union as Ford and AeroVironment have teamed up for electric future trying to unify electric charging standards under one brand.

It is clear that nothing less than 11,000 electric car owners with their fast charging stations can not be wrong, or at least this is what I think Ford as Ford and AeroVironment have teamed up for the latter is the official supplier of stations domestic cargo at Level 2. It is clear that there is currently much controversy about the universality of this type connectors for quick recharging stations, and while brands like Nissan are betting on CHAdeMO system , the European Union is its roll Mennekes approving the German connector as standard for a not too distant future. So how to go crazy with so many technical specifications and benefits between a connector and another if in the end everyone will do what they damn well gives?. In the end I think sales will be electric models that will drive the standard connector to be imposed, and not governments or public entities.

Anyway, the good news is that the alliance between Ford and AeroVironment is a new pressure point for those seeking an electric model without the problem of the happy connectors for power stations. Perhaps in this way in the end the world through governments opt for one or the other depending on the number of users who have purchased either model. Anyway until done and stable, then at least we can say that all electric Ford models use the same connector, and less and be nothing. Specifically, Ford and AeroVironment have worked together to use their own systems of 240 volts and identical connectors on the Ford C-Max, Ford Fusion plug-in and the Ford Focus EV. Thus, Level 2 systems will be able to recharge these vehicles recharging plug-in in less than three hours, whereas the Ford Focus EV will in less than four. On the other hand, I must say that AeroVironment has established throughout the United States about 10,000 electric charging stations and pretend to be the reference in the not too distant future.

Also remember that AeroVironment also provides rapid charging stations to models like the Nissan LEAF, with corresponding CHAdeMO connector while in the case of Ford and AeroVironment still do not know their final specifications, since the same Ford has varied Over the years. Still, it is well to remember that in the U.S. electricity market sold in April were about 5,500 units of the Nissan LEAF, about 5,550 units of the Chevrolet Volt and a 3000 Ford Fusion plug-in. So there is still a long way to go in the direction of unification and standard connectors. Perhaps future connections between car manufacturers and brands that can help. We'll see.

Admission Ford and AeroVironment, united by a cause electrical increasingly appears first in MotorFull .