Latest in the Section
- Apple retira Bang with Friends para iPhone de la App Store
- Telcel What is the plan that suits you?
- Apple strikes back and removes Bang With Friends from the App Store
- Apple retira Bang With Friends de la App Store
- IFTTT Recipes to take advantage of LinkedIn
- Harry Potter's spell to hack Macs
- Microsoft prepares major changes to the interface of the new Xbox
- The cool new Microsoft ad for IE10
- Best of the Week XVI: apps, extensions and programs
- Opportunity is the vehicle NASA has traveled farther away from Earth
Popular in the Section
- Uncharted 2 was one of the best games of 2009
- Synergy-Plus program, which allows us to control with a single keyboard and mouse several machines
- VBulletin case: "This decision is a true cross-Shirt to Spanish sovereignty"
- Inadvisable online mode of FIFA 2010 with Gamblers Anonymous
- Blood Moon, the adventures of the undead
- Olloclip brings the iPhone's camera to the next level
- Sasha Grey, Hulk Hogan y Daniel Dae Kim protagonizarán Saints Row: The Third
- Heavy Rain, Quantic Dream ultimate
- Party at home with friends and a dealer hand of Four Roses
- Dragon Age: Origins and the mod called "Natural Bodies"
Be careful what you write, you watch |
|
|
| Technology - General | |||
| Saturday, 28 July 2012 15:30 | |||
|
You have always been part of the statistics. Of low or high, of those who buy or not. Now that you manifest in your network, you write on Twitter or Facebook, many organizations know more about you. Automatic systems begin to draw conclusions from your trail on the network. As a new study in which psychopathic tendency correlates with certain features of Twitter.
An analysis of how you write on Twitter can reveal if you're narcissistic, Machiavellian or psychopathic, according to a recent survey . Some of the defining features are: curses, angry responses to other people including insults and the word "hate", the use of the word "we" instead of "I", the use of points or the use of words, such as blah, blah or ummm. The study's author, Chris Sumner thinks
The study is a response to a similar one called "Hungry like a wolf: an analysis of patterns of words in the language of psychopaths." The study was conducted with almost 3000 participants who scored themselves in the so-called Dark Triad: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. The results showed a number of significant correlations between the personality of the individual dark and activity on Twitter. The study used a machine learning model to be improving predictions. Activity at Twitter was translated into numbers, namely 337 points showing the frequency number of tweets or linguistic features among others. The data fueled a data model that was exploited with datawarehouse techniques or Big Data . How far can this analysis? Sumner himself is reluctant. Technically there is the problem of false positives, people who appear as though they are not psychopaths. And in general, move from general studies to particular cases is scientifically dubious, as well as morally problematic, and privacy.
We passed a world where privacy is scarce and we have stripped to the public. What I write on the network can remain there for many years. Some behaviors are highly recommended. It is the case of the writer: "Tomorrow I have an interview for a job in a company awful awful" and it turns out that the interviewer has read the message. However, everyone is entitled to be a troll but why police pursued him. The debate is open: every day we are free, but the guards do not rest automatic.
|




